69
69
Apr 14, 2013
04/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 69
favorite 0
quote 0
and we've had a remarkable show of force, both f-22's and b-2's to demonstrate that we're serious about the north korea threat but as we were doing that, i was being told air force plans to cut flying hours by 18% as a result of the sequester. air combat command informed us as of this week, it will enter what they call a tier ready status. one third of its flying units will cease flying or stand down for the remainder of fiscal year 2013. how will that cessation or tiered readiness of flying units affect your important and critical missions in paycom? >> well, as i indicated earlier, the -- back to the sequestration and paycom in the near midterm will be the degradation of readiness of our forces that would have to fall on. so what we've done in the near term is to ensure that we're able to manage the scenarios that are most important to us, in my case, north korea manage that, manage our homeland defense but as the sequestration starts to move downstream, we start to see more and more negative impacts on the readiness of our force. so what it means to air combat command is that the for
and we've had a remarkable show of force, both f-22's and b-2's to demonstrate that we're serious about the north korea threat but as we were doing that, i was being told air force plans to cut flying hours by 18% as a result of the sequester. air combat command informed us as of this week, it will enter what they call a tier ready status. one third of its flying units will cease flying or stand down for the remainder of fiscal year 2013. how will that cessation or tiered readiness of flying...
90
90
Apr 18, 2013
04/13
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 90
favorite 0
quote 0
b i in terms of running those organizations. what is the added value based on the money spent on the fusion centers and what do they bring? it was real privacy rights that have been violated at fusion centers that have to be cleaned p. we are not the number one funder of that. the question is with a limited budget, where do we get the most bang for our buck? as we researched this, but we found is not very good value for the money we are giving. your job is to be a visionary and you think that value will come. i just have real doubts on it. in a time of limited budget, much -- my hope is taking something that is working well and enhance them where we can to do everything you want to see in a fusion center done there rather than have two separate organizations. you and i will continue that conversation in the future and hopefully we will get a better bang for our buck of what is oing into fusion centers and more product that is usable. >> i would be happy to work with you on that. i would hope to persuade you that what we need are
b i in terms of running those organizations. what is the added value based on the money spent on the fusion centers and what do they bring? it was real privacy rights that have been violated at fusion centers that have to be cleaned p. we are not the number one funder of that. the question is with a limited budget, where do we get the most bang for our buck? as we researched this, but we found is not very good value for the money we are giving. your job is to be a visionary and you think that...
102
102
Apr 12, 2013
04/13
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 102
favorite 0
quote 0
they've given us an excuse to move in with the b-2 flyovers and the f-22s, not something that china wants to see long-term. >> and secretary cohen. i want to end on you, which is the question andrea and i have been talking about all week and that everyone has been talking about all week, is this time with north korea different? do we have any way of knowing that? >> i think it's different, in the sense that you have a young and i would say rather immature young leader who really doesn't have much worldly experience. and again escalating the rhetoric to the point of threatening a nuclear attack upon the united states or our allies. when you engage in that kind of rhetoric, it becomes much more difficult to find a way down from the heights of that. and so i think that it makes it different now that we see that they are becoming much more aggressive. at least rhetorically. they are developing more in terms of the testing of the third test of a nuclear weapon. they are going to be testing a longer-range missile capability. so it's different because you've got a young leader who doesn't, i thi
they've given us an excuse to move in with the b-2 flyovers and the f-22s, not something that china wants to see long-term. >> and secretary cohen. i want to end on you, which is the question andrea and i have been talking about all week and that everyone has been talking about all week, is this time with north korea different? do we have any way of knowing that? >> i think it's different, in the sense that you have a young and i would say rather immature young leader who really...
101
101
Apr 15, 2013
04/13
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 101
favorite 0
quote 0
they're concerned about the missile defenses, they're concerned about the b-2s and the f-22s, shoet of force thats with deliberately aim dodd reinforce the show of strength to our allies in south korea and japan. >> i think it was very important that the united states make clear to not just the north koreans, that there were conventions fconsequences for their action, but to reaffirm to the allies that the security agreements will uphold and i think it's important to focus the chinese to the fact that if they're not prepared to put the pressure on the north and they have the greatest impact on the north, then this can become more destabilizing. and that instability is not in china's interest certainly. it's not in anybody's interest in the region. if wub goes to obld operate accord lgd to what's in everybody's interest, china needs to be more engaged in the effort. >> china did notç celebrate th national day in north korea. that's a signal. but what more do you want to see? what do you want to see that's real that means money. that means pressure? what do you want do see china do? >>
they're concerned about the missile defenses, they're concerned about the b-2s and the f-22s, shoet of force thats with deliberately aim dodd reinforce the show of strength to our allies in south korea and japan. >> i think it was very important that the united states make clear to not just the north koreans, that there were conventions fconsequences for their action, but to reaffirm to the allies that the security agreements will uphold and i think it's important to focus the chinese to...